![]() Pressure will increase on the Senate (whether controlled by Democrats or Mr McConnell’s Republicans) to tame the excesses of maga-world. Few expect the fickle Kevin McCarthy, the Republican House leader, to resist the Trumpian right, even though he has praised Mr Zelensky as “a modern-day Winston Churchill”. If they make up a bigger share of Republicans in the House-where spending bills originate-and particularly if they hold the balance of power, it will become harder to provide more aid to Ukraine. Still, he frets, they could grow larger after the elections. maga disciples are still a minority among congressional Republicans. Such boasting amounts to “wish-casting”, says Eric Edelman, a former Pentagon official under George W. ![]() Republican leaders, he predicted, would not be able to stop Trumpists like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz “from dictating our Ukraine policy”. “Fact is if the Republicans take over the House in 2022 us support to Ukraine will come to a halt,” tweeted Ruben Gallego, a House Democrat. He denounced the recent aid for Ukraine, saying: “The Democrats are sending another $40bn to Ukraine, yet America’s parents are struggling to even feed their children.” His base might be energised if, in coming weeks, he announces he will run for president again in 2024. Mr Trump still holds much of the party in thrall. Armor in the superstructure is especially problematic because it adds weight high in a ship, which can affect stability.” “You don’t want armor to get in the way of sensors like radar, and countermeasures like EW systems, and of weapons launchers like VLS. “Adding more armor to ships would be helpful, but will add weight and could impact the ability to place sensors, weapons, and other mission systems where they are most effective,” Clark said. In either case, added armor might impact the vessels’ stability and maneuverability. However, there is a trade off, the ship would necessarily have to dedicate more space to carry armor-or it would have to be larger. If a DDG were struck forward, as in this case, weapons and sensors would be even more likely to end up out of commission.” Clark agreed that there is an argument to be made to adding armor to modern warships. For example, a DDG hit by a small ASCM that damages the aft VLS magazine and helo hangar would not necessarily take a DDG completely out of service, but the loss of weapons capacity and of aft-facing sensors like SLQ-32 may make the ship too vulnerable to operate in a contested environment. It is also driven by improving threats and the number of fragile, interconnected sensors, computers, and weapons launchers distributed throughout the ship. “That is not only a function of having less armor on today’s warships, however. A small ASCM may not cause a comparable level of damage as this collision.” “I agree this shows how a modern warship is relatively easy to take out of action,” Clark said. “To cause similar damage with a missile, you would need a large warhead that causes a lot of hull and fire damage or a torpedo that damages the ship below the waterline. “This is a mission kill on Fitzgerald that will require months and likely more than $100 million to repair,” Bryan Clark, a former naval officer and senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments told The National Interest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |